Sunday, 28 February 2010
Friday, 26 February 2010
Peter Mandelson - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Peter Mandelson - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
eter Mandelson publicly recognised his long term relationship with ... Peter Mandelson: 'Prince of Darkness' who travels the world spreading the ...
eter Mandelson publicly recognised his long term relationship with ... Peter Mandelson: 'Prince of Darkness' who travels the world spreading the ...
WHY LABOUR WANT TO LOSE THE ELECTION
1. labour have deliberately poisoned the wells and wrecked the economy.- not out of incompetence or bloody mindedness, but for a clear calculating- well worked -out reasons.surely that much is obvious, glaringly so
2. this is not brown's plan-he is too dim- it is mandelson's idea.
3, mandelson wants the conservatives to inherit a wrecked economy
4. thus he wants the conservatives to win.
conclusion: darling's gaffe was intentional; no co-incidence.he was told to say exactly what he said
mandelson is playing a long, long, game; figure him out and you get the whole picture; mandelson wants rid of brown and the conservatives(you win, and he kills 2 birds with one stone). and he has visions of himself as a great labour leader,triumphantly returning to take over the country when Mr.Cameron and the conservatives have been broken by being crushed under the weigh of a collapsing economy.(yes, that plan has its downsides too, but remember, he is playing a very long game indeed)
I really hope that Mr Cameron has the measure of his real enemy and can see the trap that is being laid for him; goodness me, if a crippled old barrister can see it, he should be able to
i
mind we mandelson is an extremely dangerous and ruthless cyniC.
5 gives you 5 million that there will be a fair few more accidentally on purpose cockups by labour; their plan is NOT to win; else why else deliberately poison the wells?- and delay calling an election when the polls had swung their way; mind well mandelson is the real boss and he calls all the shots- brown just does as he's told
mark my words , this is one election the conservatives should not want to win; it's screamingly obvious. OK, they cannot just give up but they can follow labour's example and rig a few cockups of their own
2. this is not brown's plan-he is too dim- it is mandelson's idea.
3, mandelson wants the conservatives to inherit a wrecked economy
4. thus he wants the conservatives to win.
conclusion: darling's gaffe was intentional; no co-incidence.he was told to say exactly what he said
mandelson is playing a long, long, game; figure him out and you get the whole picture; mandelson wants rid of brown and the conservatives(you win, and he kills 2 birds with one stone). and he has visions of himself as a great labour leader,triumphantly returning to take over the country when Mr.Cameron and the conservatives have been broken by being crushed under the weigh of a collapsing economy.(yes, that plan has its downsides too, but remember, he is playing a very long game indeed)
I really hope that Mr Cameron has the measure of his real enemy and can see the trap that is being laid for him; goodness me, if a crippled old barrister can see it, he should be able to
i
mind we mandelson is an extremely dangerous and ruthless cyniC.
5 gives you 5 million that there will be a fair few more accidentally on purpose cockups by labour; their plan is NOT to win; else why else deliberately poison the wells?- and delay calling an election when the polls had swung their way; mind well mandelson is the real boss and he calls all the shots- brown just does as he's told
mark my words , this is one election the conservatives should not want to win; it's screamingly obvious. OK, they cannot just give up but they can follow labour's example and rig a few cockups of their own
Times Online | News and Views from The Times and Sunday Times
Times Online | News and Views from The Times and Sunday Times
MY COMMENT:
lan Johnson is a silly little oik and far to dim to understand that it is bad form for pipsqueak ministers to criticise senior judges, who cannot and do not descend to their level
MY COMMENT:
lan Johnson is a silly little oik and far to dim to understand that it is bad form for pipsqueak ministers to criticise senior judges, who cannot and do not descend to their level
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)